Height: 4.73 m. 4.33 m. Mikoyan MiG-29 Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Length Width Height 0 5 10 15 20. Mikoyan MiG-29. Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. Length. 17.37. 15.67.
To the Flankerβs immediate right, we see an early model Soviet Air Force Mikoyan MiG-29 A that is absolutely dwarfed by the big Su-27. The MiG-29 measures some 57 feet long and nearly 16 feet
F-35 LIGHTNING 2: SUKHOI SU-35: BVR Rating: 94%: 87%: Armament: 8.6/10: 8.4/10: Technology: 9.5/10: 8.2/10: Avionics: 9.0/10: 8.3/10: Maneuverability: 8.5/10: 9.9/10 (3D Thrust) Rate of Climb: max. 230 m/s β 45k ft/min: max. 280 m/s β 55k ft/min: Thrust/Weight: 1.07: 1.21: Service Ceiling: 20 km β 65k ft: 18 km β 59k ft: Speed: 1.60
Side-by-side comparison of the Mikoyan MiG-35 (Fulcrum-F) against the Sukhoi Su-35 (Flanker-E / Super Flanker). Kh-25ML, Kh-25MP, Kh-29, Kh-31, and Kh-59 Air-to
The Flanker can reach Mach 2.35 with a thrust-to-weight ratio above one (depending on fuel load). the fifth-generation stealth fighter intended to replace both the MiG-29 and the Su-27.
Su-33 production stopped! There were no updates. MiG kept developing it, and India made the rational choice of going for one that had more of a future than the other. Russia chose the Su-33 at first. Sukhoi proved to Soviet MAP it was superior. Russia chose the new MiG-29 because Su-33 production stopped and MiG was already building Migs for India.
joocYU. 96xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/20296xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/4796xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/4996xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/9496xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/37296xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/15796xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/14796xu4yw9jc.pages.dev/25
mig 29 su 35 size comparison